Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41891826›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026

Prognostic Significance of Intraindividual CT and MRI LI-RADS Agreement and Discordance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Yong Jun Jung, Seokhwi Kim, In Hye Song, Ju Hyun Shim, Seung Soo Lee, Subin Heo, Sang Hyun Choi

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yong Jun JungDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4663-2738
Seokhwi KimDepartment of Pathology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7646-5064
In Hye SongDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ju Hyun ShimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7336-1371
Seung Soo LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5518-2249
Subin Heo *Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4700-1014
Sang Hyun Choi *Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-6617

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To assess the intraindividual concordance and discordance in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categorizations between CT and MRI for surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to evaluate their association with early postsurgical recurrence. Materials and Methods This dual-center retrospective study included patients who underwent both CT and MRI before hepatic resection for HCC between January 2016 and December 2020. For each HCC lesion, the LI-RADS category was independently assigned at CT and MRI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations between the CT and MRI LI-RADS categorizations (LI-RADS category M [LR-M] vs LI-RADS category 4 or 5 [LR-4/5]) and 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate. Patients were classified into three groups according to the CT or MRI LI-RADS categorization: LR-M at both CT and MRI, at only one modality, or at neither CT or MRI. The 2-year RFS was compared among the groups. Results A total of 319 patients (mean age, 58.8 years ± 9.7 [SD]; 248 male patients) were included, with HCC lesions of 114 (35.7%) patients showing discrepant CT or MRI LI-RADS categorizations. LR-M categorization was more common at MRI than at CT (21.6% vs 6.0%;

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularLiver NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCTHepatocellular CarcinomaLiver Imaging Reporting and Data SystemMRIPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID41891826
PMCPMC13036666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.