ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2026
TumorSynth: Integrated Brain Tumor and Tissue Segmentation on Brain MRI Scans of Any Resolution and Contrast.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a deep neural network that simultaneously segments brain tumors and anatomic structures, regardless of the contrast and resolution of the input scans, and can effortlessly adapt to unseen modalities. Materials and Methods The authors included various MRI scans from patients with and without brain tumors from four different datasets. Patient data were divided into a training set and a test set. The authors' method, TumorSynth, combines a Bayesian generative model and a deep learning segmentation model. The generative model creates paired synthetic labels and images with simulated tumors and brain tissues, providing a rich dataset for training the segmentation model. The authors quantitatively compared its performance with that of other widely used methods by calculating Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs). Results A total of 1971 patients with and without tumors were included in the study (training set,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.