Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41891800›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia

Assessing the Impact of the 2021 VWD Guidelines on the Diagnosis/Management of Low VWF Patients.

Michael Dong, Joanna Larson, Sepideh Saroukhani, Miguel Escobar, Lakshmi Srivaths

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael DongGulf States Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6982-4410
Joanna LarsonGulf States Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sepideh SaroukhaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7704-3728
Miguel EscobarGulf States Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2944-0240
Lakshmi SrivathsGulf States Hemophilia and Thrombophilia Center Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5324-7053

Funding

Biostatistics/ Epidemiology/ Research Design (BERD)Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS) 1UM1TR004906-01Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS) UL1TR003167National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe 2021 ASH/ISTH/NHF/WFH VWD diagnosis guidelines recommend Type 1 VWD diagnoses for patients with (a) VWF <0.30 IU/mL or (b) 'Low VWF' 0.30-0.50 IU/mL with the presence of abnormal bleeding. This recommendation recategorizes 'Low VWF' patients with abnormal bleeding into Type 1 VWD.

aimTo assess the impact of the 2021 VWD guidelines on the diagnosis and management of 'Low VWF' patients.

methodsA single centre retrospective study was conducted to review all patients presenting for VWD evaluation between January 2000 to September 2024, analyzing for clinical features, ISTH-BAT scores, VWF/FVIII levels, and management of bleeding. 149 patients, totalling 305 clinical encounters, were included in the study.

resultsSeventy five percent of patient encounters had a change in diagnosis from 'Low VWF' to Type 1 VWD after applying the 2021 VWD diagnosis guidelines. The use of VWF therapy (statistically significant, p = 0.04) and antifibrinolytics (not statistically significant, p = 0.52) increased in the post-guidelines period compared to pre-guidelines period. More than half saw increasing VWF levels with age, emphasizing the need to periodically re-evaluate/re-test patients with 'Low VWF'.

conclusionApplying the 2021 VWD guidelines leads to improved diagnosis and management of symptomatic patients with 'Low VWF' as they are now classified as Type 1 VWD and receive optimal care with increased use of haemostatic therapy.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsHemorrhagePractice Guidelines as Topicvon Willebrand Diseasesvon Willebrand FactorAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHematologyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedAntifibrinolytic Agentsvon Willebrand Factorlow VWFtype 1 VWDVWD guidelines

Identifiers

PMID41891800
PMCPMC13175425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.