ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)
Status Epilepticus After Electrocution Injury in a Dog.
Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Status Epilepticus After Electrocution Injury in a Dog.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe a case of status epilepticus secondary to electrocution injury associated with an electric fence. CASE SUMMARY: A 1.5-year-old male Kangal Shepherd Dog mix was presented to the emergency service after being entangled in an agricultural electric fence for 1-2 h. On presentation, the dog was recumbent, was unable to stand or walk, and showed severe hypersalivation, panting, and tachycardia. No electrical burn injuries were observed, and the remaining physical and neurologic examination parameters were normal. ECG and thoracic radiographs showed no abnormalities. During further assessment and stabilization of the patient, generalized tonic-clonic seizures occurred. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications had no effect, and antiseizure therapy was escalated in response to the refractory seizure activity. With escalation of the antiseizure therapy, the dog became unable to sufficiently ventilate, requiring initiation of mechanical ventilation. Given the rapid deterioration and refractory seizure activity, a 24-h electroencephalogram (EEG) was performed to guide further treatment and provide prognostic information. EEG monitoring revealed physiologic background activity, and the dog was successfully weaned after a total of 30 h of mechanical ventilation. Antiseizure therapy was slowly tapered throughout the remaining hospital stay, and the dog made a full neurologic and clinical recovery and was discharged with oral phenobarbital after 7 days. Four weeks after discontinuation of phenobarbital, the dog experienced a recurrence of seizure activity, and medication was reinitiated. NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case describing the successful management, including ventilation and EEG monitoring, of a dog with status epilepticus secondary to electrocution injury associated with an electric fence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.