SynthesisJournal of global health2026
Prevalence of preserved ratio impaired spirometry and restrictive spirometry pattern in the general population: a systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis of studies from multiple countries.
Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a multimodal risk prediction model for early COPD progression: a retrospective study integrating clinical, functional, and CT radiomic features.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Both preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) (defined as a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <80% of predicted, while the ratio of FEV1 to forced vital capacity (FVC) is ≥0.7) and restrictive spirometry pattern (RSP) (defined as FVC<80% of predicted, while the FEV1/FVC ratio ≥0.7) are associated with an increased risk of mortality. The global prevalence of PRISm and RSP in the general population remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the prevalence and identify risk factors of PRISm and RSP in the general population, and to examine variations across subgroups defined by gender, smoking status, WHO regions, and World Bank income levels. Methods: We searched three databases for studies that reported the prevalence of PRISm and RSP, and their associated risk factors in the general population. We conducted a multi-level meta-analysis, along with standard random-effects modelling, to estimate the pooled prevalence and identify key risk factors, and performed meta-regression and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of the results. Results: We identified a total of 57 studies reporting population-based data from 31 countries. We included 48 studies for meta-analysis using the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) definition, resulting in a pooled sample of 1 129 807 participants. The pooled prevalence of GOLD-PRISm was 10.60% (19 studies; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.12, 13.73), while the prevalence of GOLD-RSP was 12.09% (23 studies; 95% CI = 7.90, 18.04). The simultaneous combined prevalence of GOLD-PRISm and RSP was 11.79% (38 studies; 95% CI = 9.11, 15.12). Subgroup analysis showed that current smokers (13.37% vs. 10.18% in ex-smokers and 10.87% in non-smokers), and Western Pacific Region populations (11.26%) had higher prevalence rates of GOLD-PRISm. Significant risk factors for GOLD-PRISm include older adults, current and former smoking, extreme body mass index, and a history of comorbidities, such as asthma, diabetes, hypertension, and stroke. Conclusions: We provide a pooled estimate of PRISm and RSP prevalence based on studies from multiple regions, highlighting significant regional and demographic variations. Key risk factors, particularly smoking and comorbidities, should be considered when developing early management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.