SynthesisExperimental dermatology2026
Efficacy and Safety of Topical Delgocitinib for Chronic Hand Eczema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Experimental dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic hand eczema (CHE) is associated with substantial functional impairment and reduced quality of life. Delgocitinib, a pan-Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, has emerged as a promising topical treatment for CHE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib 20-30 mg/g compared with vehicle in patients with CHE. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EU CTR, and WHO ICTRP were searched up to 15 February 2026. The primary outcome was treatment success at week 16, defined as clear or almost clear skin with a ≥ 2-point improvement on the Investigator's or Physician's Global Assessment (IGA/PGA). Secondary outcomes included treatment success at weeks 4 and 8, changes in Hand Eczema Symptom Diary (HESD) itch and pain scores, and safety outcomes. Relative risks (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Three publications reporting four RCTs involving 1154 patients were included, with 752 receiving delgocitinib and 402 receiving vehicle. At week 16, treatment success was significantly higher with delgocitinib (RR 3.17; 95% CI 1.78-5.65; p < 0.01), corresponding to an absolute risk difference of 16.9% and a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6 (95% CI 3-16). Similar results at weeks 4 and 8. Delgocitinib also led to significantly greater improvements in HESD itch and pain scores. No significant differences were found in overall adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, or serious AEs. Discontinuation due to AEs was lower in the delgocitinib group. Delgocitinib 20-30 mg/g demonstrated greater efficacy than vehicle and a favourable safety profile, supporting its use as a topical treatment for CHE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.