Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41891452›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2026

Non-hospital occupational blood exposure accidents: A nine-year retrospective analysis of post-exposure HIV, hepatitis B and C risk management in the Netherlands.

Elfi E H G Brouwers, Henriëtte L G Ter Waarbeek, Carlijn Somers, Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers, Casper D J den Heijer, Christian J P A Hoebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elfi E H G BrouwersDepartment of Health Policy and Development, Living Lab Public Health Mosa (AWPG Mosa), https://ror.org/04af0r679South Limburg Public Health Service, 6400 AAHeerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7308-5671
Henriëtte L G Ter WaarbeekDepartment of Health Policy and Development, Living Lab Public Health Mosa (AWPG Mosa), https://ror.org/04af0r679South Limburg Public Health Service, 6400 AAHeerlen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7354-1786
Carlijn SomersDepartment of Health Policy and Development, Living Lab Public Health Mosa (AWPG Mosa), https://ror.org/04af0r679South Limburg Public Health Service, 6400 AAHeerlen, The Netherlands.
Nicole H T M Dukers-MuijrersDepartment of Health Policy and Development, Living Lab Public Health Mosa (AWPG Mosa), https://ror.org/04af0r679South Limburg Public Health Service, 6400 AAHeerlen, The Netherlands.
Casper D J den HeijerDepartment of Health Policy and Development, Living Lab Public Health Mosa (AWPG Mosa), https://ror.org/04af0r679South Limburg Public Health Service, 6400 AAHeerlen, The Netherlands.
Christian J P A HoebeDepartment of Health Policy and Development, Living Lab Public Health Mosa (AWPG Mosa), https://ror.org/04af0r679South Limburg Public Health Service, 6400 AAHeerlen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Centrum Infectieziektebestrijding, Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu 3910042010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational blood exposure accidents (OBEAs) pose significant risks to healthcare workers, potentially exposing them to hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), and HIV. While most research focuses on hospital settings, this study assessed OBEA management in non-hospital contexts. Although our data predate the COVID pandemic, findings remain highly relevant, especially for healthcare professionals working outside hospital settings. A retrospective analysis of OBEA registry data (2006-2014) was conducted in a southern Dutch region. Data included demographics, profession, workplace, injury type, source status (HBV, HCV, HIV), risk assessment, post-exposure measures, and lab results. Chi-square and t-tests were applied. In total, 975 OBEA were reported. Among nurses, medical assistants, students, and housekeeping staff, subcutaneous needles (51-67%) and lancets (25%) were common exposure sources. Police officers mainly reported biting (26%), scratching, or spitting (70%). HBV vaccination coverage ranged from 18% (housekeeping) to over 90% (nurses, police). Post-exposure measures were taken in 52% of cases. High-risk exposures (43%) mainly affected ambulance staff, sterilization workers, police, and dentists. Sources were tested in 85% of high-risk cases: 1.4% were HBV positive, 2% HCV positive, and 1.1% HIV positive. No seroconversions occurred. Results stress the need for better HBV vaccination coverage, targeted prevention, and prompt OBEA reporting outside hospital settings.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalHealth PersonnelHepatitis BHepatitis CHIV InfectionsOccupational ExposureAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedlestick InjuriesNetherlandsPost-Exposure ProphylaxisRetrospective StudiesRisk Managementblood-borne virus (BBV)blood exposure accidentshepatitis Bhepatitis CHIVinfectious diseasesneedle stick injuries (NSI)occupational healthpost-exposure risk assessmentpublic healthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID41891452
PMCPMC13161801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.