ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Multi-Site Study of Patient Reported Vision Quality and Dry Eye Following LASIK.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess patient subjective responses regarding satisfaction of vision, visual disturbances, and dry eye symptoms following WaveLight LASIK surgery for myopia or myopic astigmatism. Methods: This was an ambispective, multicenter, multi-surgeon, single arm, observational study. Subjects were included who had Wavefront Optimized or Phorcidies Planned Contoura LASIK (using the Wavelight EX500 laser) for myopia or myopic astigmatism (targeting bilateral emmetropia) within the last 12 to 15 months. Eligible subjects were identified by retrospective chart review and administered a modified Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK (PROWL), Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), and dry eye questionnaires. Results: A total of 300 subjects completed the study. Postoperatively, all patients were satisfied with their vision, with 95% (285/300) reported being "Completely Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied". In addition, 95% (285/300), 79% (237/300), 78% (234/300), and 70% (210/300) of subjects reported "Never" or "Rarely" experiencing double images, glare, halos, and starbursts, respectively, while 0% (0/300), 2% (6/300), 1% (3/300), and 3% (9/300) of subjects reported that these same visual disturbances were "Extremely" or "Very" bothersome, respectively. Furthermore, 98% (294/300) of patients said they would choose to have the procedure again and 98% (294/300) would recommend it. Mean score on the OSDI questionnaire was 8.7 ± 8.2, with the majority (71%, 213/300) of the subjects being asymptomatic (score < 12). The mean OSDI score was within the range indicative of a normal ocular surface. Conclusion: The results suggest high patient satisfaction of vision after approximately 12 months following Wavelight LASIK. Visual disturbances were rated low in frequency and in bothersomeness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.