ReviewInternational journal of transgender health2026
Prostatic diseases in transgender women: A systematic review of diagnosis, risk, and management.
Review in International journal of transgender health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Most transgender women have their prostate left in situ throughout and after their transition. Managing prostate‑related conditions in transgender women remains challenging due to the lack of clear recommendations. This review aims to summarize the available data on prostate health, including cancer screening and treatment, lower urinary tract symptoms, and prostate evaluation. Material and methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement using PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library, with the keywords (prostate), (lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)), (prostate evaluation), and (transgender women). All relevant data were analyzed. Results: Twenty studies were included in the final analysis: 15 focused on prostate cancer, four on LUTS, and one on prostate evaluation. A total of 961 prostate cancer cases were identified. Of the 17 detailed oncologic treatments, the most common were surgery and hormone therapy. Data regarding LUTS and prostate evaluation were very limited; the most frequently reported symptom was a split urinary stream. Surgical interventions for LUTS included two cases of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and one Rezum procedure. Prostate evaluation was performed via transvaginal exam in 50 patients. Transvaginal ultrasonographic assessment of the prostate was feasible in 67 out of 70 patients (96%). Conclusion: The present systematic review demonstrates that prostatic diseases can occur in transgender women. Neovaginal prostatic exam appears as the appropriate way to assess the prostate on physical exam. The paucity of data highlights the need to raise awareness of healthcare professionals and to promote further research on this critical issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.