ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Comparison of three linezolid management strategies for peripheral neuropathy in multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis treatment: a target trial emulation.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Peripheral neuropathy frequently leads to linezolid dose reductions or interruptions during multidrug- or rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) treatment. The implications of these modifications on treatment success are uncertain. Methods: We conducted a target trial emulation using the endTB Observational Study among individuals who developed non-severe peripheral neuropathy while receiving linezolid 600 mg daily within 6 months of initiating an individualized MDR/RR-TB regimen. We examined three linezolid management strategies: immediate change (i.e., dose reduction, temporary interruption, discontinuation) within Weeks 1-7 after peripheral neuropathy onset, deferred change within Weeks 8-26, and no change (i.e., continuing linezolid 600 mg daily) during Weeks 1-26. To emulate the per-protocol analysis of a trial, we used an approach involving cloning and censoring participant data, and applying inverse probability of censoring weights. Results: Among 303 eligible participants from 12 countries, peripheral neuropathy occurred a median of 11 weeks (interquartile range: 4-18) after treatment initiation. Weighted, standardized probabilities of treatment success were 84.7% (95% CI: 69.2%, 92.9%) for immediate change, 78.9% (95% CI: 65.9%, 87.1%) for deferred change, and 85.2% (95% CI: 80.5%, 89.1%) for no change. Compared with no change, treatment success ratios were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.11) for immediate change and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78, 1.01) for deferred change. Conclusions: We did not find evidence of a substantial negative impact of immediate modification to linezolid on MDR/RR-TB treatment success. Our results support the clinical practice of cautiously adjusting linezolid when needed to manage non-severe peripheral neuropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.