ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Limb state accounts for differences between motor imagery and action in motor cortex.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The motor cortex is involved not only in movement execution but also in motor imagery, a process leveraged by decoding algorithms for brain-computer interface (BCI) applications in individuals with severe motor impairments. Previous work has shown that population activity during execution and imagery occupies partially overlapping regions of neural state space while also engaging distinct subspaces unique to each motor state, suggesting that decoders trained in one condition may not generalize to the other. Moreover, movement execution likely includes neural representations of both motor output and proprioceptive feedback, which themselves may occupy distinct or overlapping regions of neural state space. To explore these distinctions, we studied two individuals with incomplete spinal-cord injuries and partial residual proximal arm function performing a center-out reaching task in three conditions: motor imagery, active execution, and passive movement. We found that decoders trained on neural activity from motor imagery failed to generalize to either active or passive movements. In contrast, decoders trained on active or passive movement activity generalized reciprocally. Population analysis revealed distinct dynamics depending on limb state and proprioceptive feedback, which could explain this lack of generalization. These results suggest that motor imagery engages motor cortical representations distinct from those recruited during actual movements, either actively or passively generated, with important implications for the design of BCI decoders.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.