Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890931›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Psychological adaptation mechanisms of athletes' cognitive resilience in high-temperature environments.

Huixiang Guan, Songchen Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Huixiang GuanSchool of Physical Education, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, China.
Songchen GaoDepartment of Physical Education, Wuxi Taihu University, Wuxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study integrates the "Stress and Coping" theory with the "Ordinary Magic" model to propose a sequential "challenge appraisal -resource gain -cognitive resilience" framework. The framework aims to elucidate the psychological adaptation processes contributing to athletes' cognitive resilience in high-temperature environments. The study specifically explores the mediating role of challenge appraisal in the relationship between psychological resources and cognitive resilience, as well as the moderating effect of team support on this relationship. Methods: Data were collected from 240 professional athletes via a questionnaire-based survey, capturing multidimensional psychological and contextual variables. The analysis utilized structural equation modeling (SEM), latent profile analysis (LPA), and moderated effect testing to assess the proposed mediation, heterogeneity, and moderation pathways. Results: Findings reveal that cognitive resilience in high-temperature environments is a dynamic process influenced by cognitive reappraisal and resource coupling. The study demonstrates that challenge appraisal mediates the relationship between psychological resources and cognitive resilience, with team support acting as a moderating factor. Discussion: These results provide empirical support for targeted psychological interventions and the development of team-support systems in sports involving thermal stress. Additionally, the findings offer a theoretical advancement in sports psychology by transitioning from a static trait-oriented approach to a more dynamic "individual-context" interaction paradigm. This shift highlights the complex nature of psychological adaptation mechanisms in extreme environments.

Indexed as

challenge appraisalcognitive resiliencehigh-temperature environmentlatent profile analysispsychological adaptationteam support

Identifiers

PMID41890931
PMCPMC13014484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.