SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026
The global condition of higher education students' executive function research: a scoping review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity interval training for mental health and executive function in university students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral predictors of academic achievement in higher education students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Cyber-victimized and cognitively fogged? Cyberbullying victimization and executive function.BMC public health · 2026Article
- A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Research Programs on Self-Regulation in Education.Educational psychology review · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The fundamental cognitive processes known as executive functions (EF) allow people to control their thoughts, feelings, and actions to engage in goal-directed behaviour. Strong EF abilities are linked to better academic achievement and student success in higher education (HE). This scoping review sought to map the volume and nature of scholarly articles published between 2014 and 2024 that address undergraduate students' EF skills in HE worldwide. The databases of Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCOHost were thoroughly searched. The review adhered to the scoping review process developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The inclusion criteria were met by 28 articles after 8,237 records were screened. The literature indicates a sharp rise in scholarly attention in the last 3 years, increasingly favouring multidisciplinary work. The association between EF and academic achievement is the focus of many studies, which use quantitative approaches. Most research is carried out in nations in the northern hemisphere and frequently incorporates viewpoints from other disciplines. The conceptual and methodological complexity in this topic is highlighted by the variety of EF components studied and the breadth of assessment techniques employed. To develop successful educational interventions and support measures, our findings emphasise the need for more inclusive, international, and diverse approaches to the research of EF in HE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.