Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890927›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2026

The global condition of higher education students' executive function research: a scoping review.

Lorette Pretorius, Marita M Heyns

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lorette PretoriusOptentia Research Unit, Northwest University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Marita M HeynsOptentia Research Unit, Northwest University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental cognitive processes known as executive functions (EF) allow people to control their thoughts, feelings, and actions to engage in goal-directed behaviour. Strong EF abilities are linked to better academic achievement and student success in higher education (HE). This scoping review sought to map the volume and nature of scholarly articles published between 2014 and 2024 that address undergraduate students' EF skills in HE worldwide. The databases of Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCOHost were thoroughly searched. The review adhered to the scoping review process developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The inclusion criteria were met by 28 articles after 8,237 records were screened. The literature indicates a sharp rise in scholarly attention in the last 3 years, increasingly favouring multidisciplinary work. The association between EF and academic achievement is the focus of many studies, which use quantitative approaches. Most research is carried out in nations in the northern hemisphere and frequently incorporates viewpoints from other disciplines. The conceptual and methodological complexity in this topic is highlighted by the variety of EF components studied and the breadth of assessment techniques employed. To develop successful educational interventions and support measures, our findings emphasise the need for more inclusive, international, and diverse approaches to the research of EF in HE.

Indexed as

academic achievementexecutive functionhigher education studentsinternational contextscoping review

Identifiers

PMID41890927
PMCPMC13013493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.