ArticleJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2026
Remodeling of Pediatric Tibial Shaft Fractures: What Should We Expect?
Article in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While the majority of tibial shaft fractures in pediatric patients are managed nonoperatively with closed reduction and casting, it is unknown how much remodeling occurs in young patients. We hypothesize that younger children would exhibit greater remodeling and lower residual angulation compared to older children six months post-injury. Methods: Patients under age 17 years at a major pediatric health system with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for closed tibial shaft fractures between January 2009 and August 2023 were included. Patients with radiographs at baseline and six-month follow-up were eligible. Exclusion criteria were operative management, open, or comminuted fractures; refractures; history of malignancy or metabolic diseases; or lack of imaging. Radiographs post-reduction and at six months were reviewed to assess translation, angulation, shortening, and remodeling in the coronal and sagittal planes. Differences in baseline and follow-up measurements were compared between children under age 8 and aged 8-16 years. Results: Thirty-eight patients (14 female) were included with an average age of 7.3 years (Range 1 year to 14 years). Baseline translation for younger patients was 13.5% ± 18.1% and 15.1% ± 13.7% in the coronal and sagittal plane, respectively; baseline translation for the older cohort was 20.9% ± 13.5 and 24.1 ± 17.3% for the coronal and sagittal plane, respectively. All patients demonstrated complete correction of fracture translation in both planes at six months post-injury ( Conclusions: Tibial shaft fracture translation resolves over six months for all pediatric patients. Younger children tend to have less residual angulation and more remodeling, particularly in the sagittal plane. Our findings suggest that more attention is needed to minimize coronal angulation following tibial shaft fractures in pediatric patients. Key Concepts: (1)Pediatric tibial shaft fractures demonstrate substantial remodeling capacity, with all study patients showing complete correction of fracture translation and shortening within six months of nonoperative treatment.(2)Nonoperative management remains an effective and reliable treatment strategy for appropriately selected pediatric tibial shaft fractures.(3)Younger children exhibit significantly greater remodeling potential, particularly in the sagittal plane, resulting in lower residual angulation compared to older children.(4)Age-related differences in remodeling support individualized treatment approaches. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.