Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890858›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Uncertainty-Aware Explainable AI for Pancreatic Cysts: Identifying Deep Learning Vulnerabilities and Ensuring Safe Clinical Triage in IPMN Management.

Halil Ertugrul Aktas, Gorkem Durak, Andrea Mia Bejar, Ziliang Hong, Rutger Hendrix, Hongyi Pan, Elif Keles, Fergan Bol, Yavuz B Taktak, Cagdas Topel and 18 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Halil Ertugrul AktasNorthwestern University.
Gorkem DurakNorthwestern University.
Andrea Mia BejarNorthwestern University.
Ziliang HongNorthwestern University.
Rutger HendrixUniversity of Catania.
Hongyi PanNorthwestern University.
Elif KelesNorthwestern University.
Fergan BolUniversity of Health Sciences Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital.
Yavuz B TaktakIstanbul University Faculty of Medicine.
Cagdas TopelNorthwestern University.
Yalcin TurStanford University.
Zheyuan ZhangNorthwestern University.
Neil R ChatterjeeNorthwestern University.
Yuri VelichkoNorthwestern University.
Concetto SpampinatoUniversity of Catania.
Ivo G SchootsErasmus MC.
Marco J BrunoErasmus MC.
Chenchan HuangNew York University.
Tamas GondaNew York University.
Alpay MedetalibeyogluIstanbul University Faculty of Medicine.
Gulbiz Dagoglu KartalIstanbul University Faculty of Medicine.
Sukru Mehmet ErturkIstanbul University Faculty of Medicine.
Lili ZhaoNorthwestern University.
Candice BolanMayo Clinic.
Frank H MillerNorthwestern University.
Michael B WallaceMayo Clinic.
Rajesh N KeswaniNorthwestern University.
Ulas BagciNorthwestern University.

Funding

Cyst-X: Interpretable Deep Learning Based Risk Stratification of Pancreatic Cystic TumorsR01CA246704 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA · PI BAGCI, ULAS · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA246704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite growing interest in AI for pancreatic cyst management, no prior study has systematically investigated how lesion characteristics influence model behavior or provided a comprehensive explainability analysis in IPMN malignancy risk stratification. We present the first multi-center study integrating explainable AI with uncertainty quantification to evaluate how cyst type, size, and location affect deep learning performance in IPMN malignancy prediction. Our retrospective study analyzed 170 IPMNs from seven centers using a radiomics-deep learning fusion model. Cases were stratified by dysplasia grade, IPMN type, size, and location; with model interpretability assessed using SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, and uncertainty quantification. Overall accuracy was 67.1%, with model uncertainty lower for correct versus incorrect predictions (0.72 vs 0.78, p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis: Low-Risk lesion accuracy exceeded High-Risk (81.3% vs. 42.9%, p < 0.001), BD accuracy was inversely correlated with cyst size while MD remained stable, and body and whole-pancreas cysts stratified more accurately than tail cysts (77.8%, 76.6% vs. 47.8%). AI models face significant, previously uncharacterized performance drops when evaluating complex high-risk IPMNs. Our study shows that integrating uncertainty quantification can successfully flag unreliable predictions, enabling a selective-prediction framework where clinicians can confidently rely on AI for low-risk, low-uncertainty lesions while deferring high-uncertainty cases to expert review.

Indexed as

Deep LearningExplainable Artificial IntelligenceIPMNPancreatic CystsRadiomicsUncertainty Quantification

Identifiers

PMID41890858
PMCPMC13015609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.