ArticleResearch square2026
Understanding how digital training enhances healthcare worker perceptions of HIV index case testing: a qualitative explanatory analysis.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05343390 (Enhancing HIV-assisted Contact Tracing in Malawi Through Blended Learning), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Enhancing HIV-assisted Contact Tracing in Malawi Through Blended Learning: an Implementation Science Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: HIV index case testing involves offering HIV testing services to the sexual partners and children of people living with HIV. In Malawi, index case testing implementation has been suboptimal due to inadequately trained health care workers (HCW). In a cluster-randomized trial, we tested the impact of a digital training approach (Enhanced strategy) to improve HCW capacity to conduct HIV index case testing services. We conducted a qualitative explanatory analysis to understand the impacts of the training on health workers' perceptions of delivering the intervention. Methods: In a cluster randomized trial, 33 clusters (health facilities) were randomized 1:2 to the Enhanced and Standard arms. HCWs in both arms received brief centralized in-person training on index case testing. HCWs in the Enhanced arm also received decentralized digital training through 20 synchronous and asynchronous sessions, which provided knowledge on protocols and principles of index case testing, modelled counseling scenarios, practice counseling, and individual feedback. We conducted 26 in-depth interviews with HCWs from 14 clusters (n = 6 Enhanced, n = 8 Standard) in the weeks after the Enhanced training. Interviews focused on HCW perceptions of their work. Interview transcripts in the weeks after training were analyzed thematically using an inductive approach. We compared responses of HCWs from Enhanced and Standard arms. Results: Overall, HCW in the Enhanced arm perceived greater ease counseling clients after the training. This was attributed to five facilitators:1) HCWs perceived the checklists as helping them operationalize ICT, 2) Video vignettes facilitated new counseling skills, 3) HCWs expressed greater comfort and confidence handling a range of clients, 4) HCWs perceived their counselling skills were more impactful, and 5) HCWs expressed greater confidence identifying and solving facility-level challenges. HCWs from the Standard arm requested additional tools, and referred to more experienced providers, reflecting less confidence in index case testing implementation. Conclusions: Digital training was viewed as a mechanism for enhancing knowledge, counselling skills, and comfort and confidence to address facility-level challenges. Digital training with video vignettes, and checklists to guide practice and feedback sessions are key strategies for HCWs capacity-building in low-resource settings. Trial Registration Number: NCT05343390.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.