ArticleResearch square2026
Sex-Based Disparities in Interval Time to Receipt of Surgical Treatment of Invasive Lung Cancer in Tennessee.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The time from diagnosis to the receipt of definitive surgical treatment can impact patients' survival. This study examines the sex-based disparities in the interval time to receipt of surgical treatment (ITRST) of invasive lung cancer (LC). Method: We analyzed retrospective Tennessee Cancer Registry data from 12,113 invasive LC patients aged 18 years or older who received surgical treatment within 52 weeks of diagnosis from 2005 to 2015. Kruskal-Wallis tests were conducted to determine the difference in ITRST within and between groups. Adjusted multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to examine the independent variables associated with delayed ITRST of LC among males and females. Results: There was a significant difference in ITRST between males and females. Decreased risk of delay ITRST was associated with increasing age among females (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.59-0.70; p = 0.001-0.006), but not among males. Black patients were less likely to delay surgical treatment compared to Whites (aHR = 0.76-0.81; P < 0.001). Married patients-overall (aHR = 1.23, p < 0.001), males (aHR = 1.26, p < 0.001), and females (aHR = 1.19, p = 0.008) were more likely to delay surgery than unmarried patients. Appalachian patients (overall aHR = 1.06; p = 0.026) were more likely to delay surgery compared to non-Appalachian patients. Patients with public insurance-overall (aHR = 1.30, p < 0.001), males (aHR = 1.30, p = 0.023), and females (aHR = 1.28, p = 0.025) had an increased risk of delayed surgery than those with private insurance, compared to self-pay/uninsured. Conclusion: Delayed ITRST for invasive LC is more likely among males, married patients, residents of the Appalachian region, and those with public insurance. Health interventions aimed at minimizing delays should target these populations to reduce disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.