ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2026
Metabolic heterogeneity, networks, and biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genipin induces liver injury by disrupting the CPS1-regulated urea cycle and redox homeostasis.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Article
- Metabolomics and Machine Learning Uncover 5'-Methylthioadenosine as a Metabolic Indicator of Mixed-Pattern Drug-Induced Liver Injury.Metabolites · 2026Article
- [Gut microbiota-associated metabolites with drug-induced liver injury].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) represents a major adverse drug reaction with significant clinical implications. The diversity of causative drug agents, incomplete understanding of pathogenic mechanisms, and absence of specific diagnostic biomarkers pose substantial challenges for DILI diagnosis and clinical management. This study aimed to characterize the metabolic heterogeneity across different types of DILI and identify high-specificity metabolic biomarkers for DILI classification. A multicenter targeted metabolomics study was conducted on 516 serum samples collected from 200 patients with DILI and 221 healthy controls. We characterized the metabolic dynamics throughout DILI progression, with significant disruptions presented in glutathione, fatty acid, and carnitine metabolism. By characterizing and comparing the metabolic profiles among antibiotics-, herbs-, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-, and statins-DILI patients, we constructed four drug-specific metabolic networks of DILI based on the metabolic coordination between metabolites. Notably, the elevated long-chain acylcarnitines (such as C18:1 Car and C16:2 Car) distinctively underlie herb-DILI's pathological progression. In monocrotaline-induced liver injury mouse models, hepatic carnitine acyltransferase II (Cpt2) mRNA expression was suppressed. Further, two-sample Mendelian randomization supported a causal relationship between C18:1 Car and total bilirubin levels. Finally, we developed a 10-metabolite classifier to distinguish between different DILI subtypes using machine learning algorithms, yielding accuracies of 0.915 and 0.904 on two independent test sets. These findings enhance the understanding of the metabolic heterogeneity in DILI and provide evidence supporting the use of responsive metabolic traits for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of DILI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.