Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890777›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026

Feeding the Skin? Foods in Personal Care Products and the Risk of Allergy.

Mara O'Connor, Peter Lio

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mara O'ConnorMs. O'Connor and Dr. Lio are with the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois.
Peter LioMs. O'Connor and Dr. Lio are with the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interrupted skin barrier seen in atopic dermatitis (AD) increases exposure to environmental antigens including those in food, which contributes to the increased prevalence of food allergies in the AD population. This relationship is further explored in the dual allergen exposure hypothesis, which examines the differences in immune system response between cutaneous and oral exposures. It was previously thought that avoiding early oral exposure would decrease the likelihood of developing food allergy; however, several studies have demonstrated that earlier oral exposure increases tolerance. On the other hand, exposure to food antigens through the skin activates the helper T-cell 2 pathway, which promotes development of allergy. There have also been several studies demonstrating that aggressive treatment of AD decreases the risk of developing food allergies. Based on these findings, there is concern that inclusion of food-based ingredients in personal care products, such as moisturizers that act as main components of AD treatment regimens, may increase the likelihood of developing allergies to the included foods. However, there are many commonly used food-based ingredients that have low rates of allergy, which raises the question of why some antigens are more likely to result in allergic sensitization while many others remain benign.

Indexed as

Atopic dermatitisdual allergen exposure hypothesisfood allergyfood-based ingredientspersonal care products

Identifiers

PMID41890777
PMCPMC13016447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.