ArticlePerspectives on behavior science2026
A Verbal Behavior Analysis of Theory of Mind: Conceptual and Applied Implications.
Article in Perspectives on behavior science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generalization and Maintenance of Prosocial Skills: A Literature Review of Strategies and Tactics.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Verbal Behavior Analysis of Theory of Mind: Conceptual and Applied Implications.Perspectives on behavior science · 2026Article
- Towards a Functional Account of Mass-Shooting: Prediction and Influence of Violent Behavior.Perspectives on behavior science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theory of Mind (ToM) is typically used as an umbrella term to refer to and interpret a collection of responses that involve humans' ability to explain and predict others' behavior based on an understanding of their mental states, such as beliefs and desires. Not only is the ToM construct widely accepted in psychology, but it has also come to represent a broader theoretical system invoked to explain a range of social and cognitive processes in both typical and autistic development, with false-belief tasks serving as its litmus test. This article offers a behavioral account of ToM as verbal behavior-in particular, that it involves the speaker-listener first tacting the environmental variables that are exerting control over another person's behavior and then, engaging in conditional discriminations under multiple verbal control with respect to the difference between those variables and the ones influencing one's own behavior. The article is organized into four sections: (1) an overview of ToM within mainstream psychology; (2) the requirements for a behavioral account and summary of current approaches; (3) an alternative analysis rooted in verbal behavior; and (4) a potential instructional sequence for establishing ToM-related repertoires in children for whom they are currently absent or incomplete. Contrary to claims that ToM may exist in nonverbal or implicit form, the present analysis argues that it is necessarily verbal-requiring speaker-listener behavior shaped by social reinforcement. It attempts to redefine ToM in functional terms-as verbal behavior (Skinner, 1957) shaped through differential contact with the contingencies governing one's own and others' actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.