ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Skeletal and non-skeletal factors associated with mandibular asymmetry in mixed dentition.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mandibular asymmetry is a complex challenge during mixed dentition. Aim: To determine the skeletal and non-skeletal factors associated with mandibular asymmetry in patients with mixed dentition. Material and Methods: The observational and cross-sectional study included 271 digital panoramic and lateral skull radiographs of patients from radiographic centers. The Eagle.PS Plate Scanner program was used to evaluate condylar morphology, lower second molar development, lower first molar loss, cervical vertebrae maturation, gonial angle, vertical growth, cranial base angle, intermaxillary relationship, and asymmetry. Frequencies, Spearman's Rho coefficient, Chi-square, and binomial logistic regression were used. Results: 57.1% of patients were female, 61.3% were aged between 6 and 9 years, and 30% were at CS4 stage. Mandibular body asymmetry is related to age ranges (p=0.011). Patients with increased vertical growth (p=0.037; OR=3.20) and loss of the lower first molar (p=0.016; OR=11.33) are more likely to have mandibular ramus asymmetry; however, patients with an open cranial base angle are less likely to have it (p=0.039; OR=0.25). On the other hand, patients with a closed gonial angle (p=0.024; OR=3.48) and a bird's beak mandibular condyle shape (p=0.046; OR=2.68) are more likely to have mandibular body asymmetry. Conclusions: Asymmetry in mandibular body is associated with the age, while a decreased gonial angle and a bird-beak condyle shape predispose to asymmetry in mandibular body height. An increased vertical growth pattern and the loss of the first permanent lower molar predispose to asymmetry in mandibular ramus height, while an increased cranial angle is associated with a lower probability.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.