Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890674›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026

Microbiological behavior of 3D printing materials for indirect restorations: A scoping review.

Pedro Thiago de Oliveira Neves, Jade Véras Diniz, Laura Buarque Caminha Lins, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Bruno Gustavo da Silva Casado, Rafaella de Souza Leão

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pedro Thiago de Oliveira NevesMaster's student, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Jade Véras DinizDoctor of Dental Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Laura Buarque Caminha LinsPhd student, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Jéssica Marcela de Luna GomesAssistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba Dental School, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Bruno Gustavo da Silva CasadoAdjunct Professor, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.
Rafaella de Souza LeãoAdjunct Professor, Division of Oral Rehabilitation, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pernambuco (UPE), Recife, PE, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although 3D-printed indirect restorations offer precision and reduced fabrication time, the literature still lacks consensus regarding their surface characteristics and microbiological behavior, factors that may reduce restoration longevity, reinforcing the need to consolidate the available evidence. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the available evidence on the microbiological behavior of 3D printing materials for indirect restorations. Material and Methods: The scoping review was conducted according to the guidelines of Arksey and O'Malley and the Joanna Briggs Institute, following the PRISMA-ScR checklist. The literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, including in vitro, in vivo, in situ, and clinical studies addressing this topic. Results: Among the 20 included studies, 19 were conducted in vitro and only one in vivo. The main factors identified as reducing microbial adhesion were the incorporation of nanoparticles (such as ZrO2, TiO2, graphene, and silanized chitosan), appropriate surface polishing, and controlled post-curing, which decreased surface roughness and enhanced antimicrobial properties. Conversely, the absence of surface finishing, insufficient post-curing time, and certain polymer compositions were associated with increased bacterial adhesion. Conclusions: Both material modification and post-fabrication treatment are key determinants of the microbiological behavior of 3D-printed resins. Furthermore, factors such as printing parameters and finishing and polishing protocols have a direct influence on the microbiological performance of these materials.

Identifiers

PMID41890674
PMCPMC13016556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.