ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
"Primary Chronic Granulomatous Sialadenitis of the Parotid Gland: A Rare Case Report".
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parotid gland tumors account for 1-3% of head and neck tumors and approximately 70-80% of all salivary gland neoplasms, most of which are benign and predominantly occur in adults. However, non-neoplastic parotid lesions, such as chronic granulomatous sialadenitis, are rare entities with an estimated incidence of 1.7%. They may present as slow-growing, painless masses that are clinically indistinguishable from benign tumors, representing a diagnostic challenge. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient with a left parotid mass of two years' evolution, initially evaluated by fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) (reported as Milan category II, non-neoplastic) and subsequently treated with surgical excision. Histopathological analysis revealed chronic granulomatous sialadenitis, with no evidence of infectious agents or apparent systemic involvement, suggesting a possible autoimmune or idiopathic origin. DISCUSSION: FNAB is the initial diagnostic method of choice due to its low cost, accuracy, and minimal complication rate. It shows a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 94%. However, when cytological findings do not allow confirmation of the nature of the lesion, or when the clinical course is atypical, surgical excision with subsequent histopathological evaluation becomes necessary. Ideally, intraoperative biopsy analysis should be available to establish the definitive diagnosis.
conclusionGranulomatous reactions in the parotid gland may result from ductal obstruction, specific infections, or systemic granulomatous diseases, making clinico-pathological and immunohistochemical correlation essential. This case highlights the importance of considering inflammatory lesions in the differential diagnosis of parotid masses and the need for a stepwise approach that combines cytology, imaging, and selective surgery.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.