Article in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
ZooKeys · 2026
Article
4 · The record
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Peter K L NgLee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (LKCNHM), 2 Conservatory Drive, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117377, Singapore North-West University Potchefstroom South Africa https://ror.org/010f1sq29.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5946-0608
Niel L BruceBiodiversity and Geosciences Program, Queensland Museum, PO Box: 3300, South Brisbane BC, Queensland 4101, Australia National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore https://ror.org/01tgyzw49.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4745-5048
Conni M SidabalokResearch Center for Biosystematics and Evolution, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), KST Soekarno, Jalan Raya Jakarta Bogor Km 46, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia National Taiwan Ocean University Keelung Taiwan https://ror.org/03bvvnt49.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-0558
Chien-Hui YangInstitute of Marine Biology and Center of Excellence for the Oceans, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 202301, R.O.C, Taiwan National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), KST Soekarno Cibinong Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4594-3622
Thanh Son NguyenDepartment of Applied Zoology, Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Ha Noi, 334 Nguyen Trai, Thanh Xuan, Hanoi, Vietnam Vietnam National University Hanoi Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5260-5536
Shane T AhyongAustralian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia, and School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia University of New South Wales Kensington Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-4158
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
DescriptiongeneticholotypemorphologySouth China Seasupergiant
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.