Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890594›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Comparative analysis of maze complexity: implications for adult hippocampal neurogenesis.

Mohamed Hesham Khalil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohamed Hesham KhalilDepartment of Architecture, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adult hippocampal neurogenesis persists throughout the lifespan in mammals and can be enhanced by environmental enrichment, including spatial complexity. Whilst maze-based enrichment has been suggested to increase neurogenesis in rodents, the relative complexity of different maze architectures has not been quantified, limiting translational research to human environments. This study used the Architectural Spatial Complexity Index (A-SCI), a novel tool, to compare spatial complexity across 16 rodent maze configurations, including mazes suggested to increase neurogenesis. Results confirm that the A-SCI significantly differentiates environmental enrichment from standard housing, whilst post-hoc analysis suggests no significant difference between maze-based and object-based enrichment, consistent with previous research reporting almost similar effects on cortical thickness. Comparative analysis revealed substantial variation in complexity across rodent maze architectures. Future research can use the A-SCI tool to validate the effect of maze complexity on adult hippocampal neurogenesis, while the Hampton Court maze may be a promising translational paradigm from rodents to humans.

Indexed as

adult hippocampal neurogenesisenvironmental enrichmenthippocampushumanmazemiceratspatial complexity

Identifiers

PMID41890594
PMCPMC13014037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.