ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026
Complication, revision, and readmission rates following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in wheelchair-dependent patients.
Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wheelchair-dependent individuals place high mechanical demand on their upper extremities, relying on their shoulders as weight-bearing joints for propulsion and transfers. Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is effective for rotator cuff-deficient shoulders, outcomes in wheelchair users remain understudied. This study evaluated short-term complication and revision rates following rTSA in wheelchair-dependent patients using a large national claims database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using PearlDiver Mariner, identifying patients who underwent primary rTSA. Wheelchair dependence was defined by International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision, International Classification of Diseases-10th Revision, and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Wheelchair users were propensity score-matched 1:5 to controls by age, sex, Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index, and length of stay. The primary outcomes were 2-year revision rates and 90-day all-cause readmission and emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary analyses evaluated specific post-operative complications including dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and infection. Results: Of 106,362 patients undergoing rTSA, 133 wheelchair users were matched to 665 controls. No significant difference was observed in 2-year revision rates (6.76% vs. 3.61%; Conclusion: Wheelchair-dependent patients undergoing rTSA experience significantly higher early complication and ED visit rates, though 2-year revision rates appear similar. These findings highlight the unique mechanical and functional challenges faced by wheelchair users, underscoring the importance of specialized perioperative care and rehabilitation strategies in this high-demand population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.