Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890540›Full record

ArticlePublic health ethics2026

Zoonoethics and Inclusive One Health Governance for H5N1 Panzootic: From Animal Culling to Co-responsibility.

Juan Alberto Lecaros, Jeyver Rodriguez

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Juan Alberto LecarosObservatory of Bioethics and Law, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0084-1489
Jeyver RodriguezCenter for Socio-Legal, Criminological, and Ethical Research (CISCE), Universidad Central, Santiago de Chile, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-7157

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) clade 2.3.4.4b has evolved into a multispecies panzootic that disrupts conventional boundaries between human, animal and environmental health systems. Using Brazil's response as an illustrative case, this article argues that prevailing containment strategies-particularly mass culling-remain ethically insufficient and practically misaligned with the ecological complexity of H5N1 transmission. To clarify the normative foundations of an alternative approach, we introduce a theoretical framework grounded in zoonoethics and global ecological bioethics, emphasizing multispecies justice, relational vulnerability, intercultural and community engagement and co-responsibility. We then apply this framework to evaluate the limitations of reactive biosecurity paradigms and to outline multispecies-sensitive One Health governance guidelines. The analysis demonstrates that effective and legitimate panzootic response requires moving beyond biomedical and anthropocentric models toward anticipatory, inclusive and ethically grounded governance capable of addressing structural drivers such as biodiversity loss, land-use change and the erosion of Indigenous territorial protections. We conclude by discussing how the H5N1 panzootic represents a 'perfect storm' that demands not only improved preparedness, but a reconceptualization of One Health as an ethical and political project of multispecies cohabitation in an era of planetary instability.

Identifiers

PMID41890540
PMCPMC13016806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.