Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890522›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2026

Development and Evaluation of an Operative Case Length Prediction Model in Adult Surgical Patients.

Jacob Walker Rosenthal, Isaac J Perron, Drew W Goldberg, Armaan A Nallicheri, Charles T Bradford, Charles C Horn, Kaley Piersanti, Bhavana Kunisetty, John H Keogh, Gary E Weissman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jacob Walker RosenthalFrom the Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Isaac J PerronCore for Precision Resource Utilization, Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
Drew W GoldbergFrom the Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Armaan A NallicheriFrom the Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Charles T BradfordCore for Precision Resource Utilization, Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
Charles C HornCore for Precision Resource Utilization, Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
Kaley PiersantiCore for Precision Resource Utilization, Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
Bhavana KunisettyCore for Precision Resource Utilization, Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
John H KeoghPerioperative and Procedural Services, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Gary E WeissmanCore for Precision Resource Utilization, Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
Rachel R KelzFrom the Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a machine learning model that predicts surgical case length and benchmark its performance against an embedded electronic health record (EHR) model. Background: Surgical care accounts for one-third of U.S. healthcare expenditure. Current case length prediction models are generally overly simplistic and inaccurate or too specialized to have a broad impact, contributing to operating room (OR) inefficiency and dissatisfaction for patients and providers. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 55,495 surgical cases performed by 299 surgeons between January 2022 and April 2024 at a metropolitan, quaternary care hospital. The dataset was split temporally for training (46,767 cases) and holdout validation (8728 cases). Three separate machine learning models predicted preprocedure, operative, and postprocedure times using patient and provider characteristics, operation details, and hospital features available at least 1 day before surgery. Approximately 22% of cases lacked historical time averages and relied on procedural time heuristics. Results: The machine learning model significantly outperformed the embedded EHR model, achieving lower root mean squared error (61.0 vs 91.0 minutes; Conclusions: A machine learning model leveraging comprehensive preoperative data significantly improved surgical case length prediction compared to an embedded EHR model. Future implementation has the potential to improve OR efficiency and patient and provider satisfaction.

Indexed as

Electronic health recordsMachine learningOperating room efficiencyPredictive modelingSurgical case duration

Identifiers

PMID41890522
PMCPMC13016189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.