Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890517›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2026

William Halsted's Radical Mastectomy Patients: A Historical Analysis Through Patient Narratives.

Juliana M Marquez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Juliana M MarquezFrom the Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The radical mastectomy-a surgery pioneered by William Stewart Halsted at The Johns Hopkins Hospital-was the gold standard surgical treatment for breast cancer until the late 20th century. The procedure included the removal of the breast and lymph nodes, as well as the pectoral muscles. The medical debate surrounding the radical mastectomy is well documented in medical journals and secondary historical sources. Also well documented are Halsted's life, surgical innovations, and his long-standing struggle with addiction. Yet, the experiences of Halsted's patients who underwent this procedure remain relatively unexplored. This article utilizes a patient-centered approach to the history of surgery and Halsted by exploring the experiences of Halsted's patients who underwent radical mastectomies. By analyzing correspondence between Halsted and his patients and family available at the Alan Mason Chesney Medical Archives, this article argues that there was a disconnect between what Halsted and his patients considered a cure after the radical mastectomy. Patients wrote to Halsted about restrictions in arm movement, arm swelling, pain, worries about recurrence, and doubts about the surgery. These concerns-which can be tied to current concerns in surgery like patients' quality of life, chronic pain, and lymphedema-show that, despite Halsted's favorable view of the surgery, patients might have seen things differently.

Indexed as

breast cancer surgerybreast surgeryhistory of surgerymedical historypatient-centered careradical mastectomyWilliam Halsted

Identifiers

PMID41890517
PMCPMC13016173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.