ArticleCureus2026
Survival and Incidence of Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNETs) are slow-growing tumors derived from enterochromaffin-like cells whose prognosis depends on the type. Prior GNET studies have shown an increasing incidence, but survival analyses have been more limited. This study aims to investigate if the increasing incidence trend continues and better describe factors associated with survival for GNET patients.
methodsIn this retrospective population-based cohort study, patients diagnosed with GNET between 2000 and 2020 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Additional variables collected were age, sex, race, stage, presence of metastases, tumor size, treatment status for surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, median household income, and population size. Descriptive statistics, population-based incidence, and Cox regression analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 6512 patients were included. The one- and five-year survival rates were 90.4% and 83.8%, respectively. The population-adjusted incidence ranged from 0.272/100,000 in 2000 to 0.680/100,000 in 2020. The total percent change in incidence over the study range was 104.1% with an annual percent change of 4.27%, which met significance (p<0.05). Chi-square analyses demonstrated significantly higher 1- and 5-year cancer-specific survival among patients aged <50 years, males, Whites, those with localized stage, no metastases, tumor size 0.1-2.0 cm, and no receipt of surgery or chemotherapy (all p < 0.001). Cox regression results showed that age of 70+ years, regional and distant staging, any distant metastases, and tumor size >2.0cm and >5.0cm were associated with shorter survival (p<0.05). Additionally, females, Hispanic patients, and recipients of surgery were associated with longer survival (p<0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: The findings show GNET incidence has continued to increase over the past two decades. Additionally, clinical factors including stage, extent of metastasis, tumor size and socioeconomic factors like age, gender, and race were associated with changes in GNET survival. In the context of the increasing incidence of GNET, these findings describe factors associated with lower- and higher-risk tumors. Further assessment of these risk factors can benefit future research to better understand why GNET incidence is increasing, aid in risk stratification of GNET patients, and improve the prognosis of GNET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.