ArticleCureus2026
Improving OB/GYN Resident Ultrasound Education Through a Simulation-Based Curriculum.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUltrasound is a fundamental skill of practicing obstetrician-gynecologists with proficiency ideally obtained in training. However, ultrasound training in residency has not been standardized and varies based on clinical experience and the number of ultrasounds performed. Simulation provides a way to standardize training while incorporating hands-on skills. This study evaluated the effects of a simulation-based ultrasound curriculum on resident confidence and the number of cases logged. Methods: This is a prospective study comparing the differences in end-of-year postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) obstetric/gynecology (OB/GYN) resident confidence and case logs in ultrasonography with and without a simulation curriculum. PGY1 residents from the 2022-2023 cohort did not train on a simulation curriculum prior to the start of their clinical training, while the PGY1 residents from the 2023-2024 class underwent both curricular training and simulated image capture. Although some residents may have had some didactic exposure to ultrasound in medical school, that experience was not taken into account. Both groups had confidence scores and case logs obtained at the end of their PGY1 year. Paired Student t-tests were performed. Results: The 2022-2023 cohort performed on average 153 transvaginal and 29 obstetric sonograms. The 2023-2024 cohort performed on average 130 transvaginal and six obstetric sonograms. The end-of-year questionnaire showed no significant difference in ultrasound confidence between the two cohorts (all items p > 0.17). Conclusions: Although the class that underwent simulation training had fewer ultrasound numbers per resident, they showed confidence ratings similar to the class with more cases. With simulation, fewer clinical sonograms may be needed to achieve the same confidence level. A standardized simulation curriculum could be a helpful adjunct to residency programs to address variance in clinical ultrasound training, and a larger-scale study to confirm these preliminary findings would be justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.