ArticleCureus2026
Competitiveness Among Physicians in Japan: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Competitiveness is a pivotal psychological construct driving motivation and professional development in medicine. While it can foster lifelong learning, maladaptive competitiveness is linked to physician burnout. Despite its significance, empirical evidence on the competitiveness of physicians in non-Western medical systems remains scarce. This study aimed to examine the distribution of competitiveness across medical specialties and its association with demographic, professional, and socioeconomic factors in a large nationwide cohort of Japanese physicians. Materials and methods We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study in June 2022 using an online survey platform. A total of 5,441 practicing physicians (median age: 48 years) from various specialties and practice settings were included. Competitiveness was assessed using a validated 20-item scale (possible range: 20-140). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with competitiveness scores after adjusting for age, gender, medical specialty, workplace characteristics, and socioeconomic background. Results The mean total competitiveness score was 58.79 (SD: 10.52). Scores differed significantly across specialties: junior residents exhibited the highest scores (M=62.17), followed by plastic surgeons (M=61.94), while psychiatrists showed the lowest (M=57.03) score. Multivariable analysis confirmed that junior residents (β=1.65; 95% CI: 0.06-3.24; p=0.042) had significantly higher scores, while psychiatrists (β=-1.68; 95% CI: -2.83 to -0.51; p=0.005) had lower scores compared to internal medicine practitioners. Other independent correlates of higher competitiveness included older age (β=0.05; p<0.001), male gender (β=2.37; p<0.001), working in large hospitals (≥300 beds: β=1.02; p=0.011), having children (β=0.98; p=0.006), and higher parental household income (β=1.11; p=0.003). Conclusions Physician competitiveness in Japan is a multidimensional construct influenced by career stage, professional culture, and personal background. Although differences across specialties are statistically significant, the overall variation and effect sizes are relatively modest. Given the cross-sectional design, these findings suggest that competitiveness is a widely observed but potentially dynamic characteristic, rather than a fixed or stable professional trait. These findings provide foundational insights for medical educators and policymakers to design career support systems that balance professional excellence with psychological well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.