Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890456›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Timing of Wound Dressing Removal After Emergency Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zahar A Zakaria, Mazrin N Mohd Ali, Fadzlin Mohd Adzlan, Anis S Musa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zahar A ZakariaObstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Kemaman, Chukai, MYS.
Mazrin N Mohd AliObstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Kemaman, Chukai, MYS.
Fadzlin Mohd AdzlanObstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Kemaman, Chukai, MYS.
Anis S MusaObstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Kemaman, Chukai, MYS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Previously, cesarean wound dressing was usually removed 48 hours after surgery, but recent data have shown that early removal is not detrimental. However, this practice is derived mainly from trials involving scheduled cesarean delivery. This study was designed to investigate the effect of wound dressing removal after emergency cesarean section during labor. Materials and methods The study was a randomized controlled trial recruiting women with a singleton, term pregnancy in the active phase of labor. The main objective was to determine the incidence of wound complications when the wound dressing was removed at 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Other outcomes of interest were the maximum pain score and the timing of showering after cesarean delivery. Results A total of 294 women were initially recruited, and data for 291 were available for final analysis. There was no significant difference in the general, labor, and surgical characteristics. The incidence of wound complications was 4.1% and 7.5% (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.19-1.5; p = 0.217) in women who had dressing removal at 24 and 48 hours after surgery, respectively. There was also no difference in maximum pain score after surgery or timing of showering related to wound dressing removal. Conclusions Early wound dressing removal, at 24 hours after surgery, in women who had emergency cesarean delivery during labor, is not associated with an increased incidence of wound complications. This result could support the practice of early discharge after cesarean delivery.

Indexed as

cesarean deliveryemergency cesareansurgical site complicationwound complicationwound dressing

Identifiers

PMID41890456
PMCPMC13015167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.