Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890454›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Dilemma of Stump Appendicitis: A Case Report.

Avinash Kumar, Maninder K Chhabra, Puneet Chhibber

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avinash KumarGeneral Surgery, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Maninder K ChhabraGeneral Surgery, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, IND.
Puneet ChhibberGeneral Surgery, Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital, New Delhi, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stump appendicitis is an uncommon but clinically significant delayed complication of appendectomy, arising from inflammation of remnant appendiceal tissue after the initial procedure. Because most clinicians do not consider appendicitis in a post-appendectomy patient, stump appendicitis frequently results in diagnostic delay and increased morbidity. We report the case of a 27-year-old man from a northern state of India who presented with features of generalized peritonitis one year after undergoing open appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Radiological evaluation suggested inflammation but failed to identify the specific pathology. Under exploratory laparotomy, a 3 cm, inflamed, and perforated appendiceal stump was identified and excised. The patient made an uneventful recovery. This case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for stump appendicitis in patients with previous appendectomy presenting with acute abdomen and emphasizes the need for meticulous surgical technique during the primary procedure.

Indexed as

appendix stumpfaecal peritonitisrecurrent appendicitisretrocaecal appendixstump

Identifiers

PMID41890454
PMCPMC13015868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.