ReviewCureus2026
Efficacy of a Superficial Cervical Plexus Block as an Alternative to General Anesthesia for Mandibular and Perimandibular Surgical Procedures: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Any oral and maxillofacial surgery often requires reliable anesthesia to ensure analgesia, patient comfort, and surgical efficiency. While general anesthesia is the traditional choice, it carries risks of cardiopulmonary complications, prolonged recovery, and higher resource utilization. A superficial cervical plexus block has emerged as a potential alternative, offering simplicity, safety, and cost-effectiveness. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the superficial cervical plexus block as an alternative to general anesthesia in mandibular and perimandibular, oral, and maxillofacial surgical procedures. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Wiley (2000-2024) was conducted. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, clinical studies, case series, and case reports involving the superficial cervical plexus block in mandibular and perimandibular surgeries. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB-2 tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute tools for specific types of included studies. Nine studies (n = 164 patients) were included where the superficial cervical plexus block alone or when combined with supplemental local blocks consistently provided effective intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. In comparative trials, superficial cervical plexus block groups demonstrated significantly lower postoperative analgesic requirements and pain scores compared to general anesthesia or local infiltration (p < 0.05). Case series and reports further supported the superficial cervical plexus block's high success rate and patient satisfaction, with negligible complications and rare conversion to general anesthesia. The superficial cervical plexus block is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in selected mandibular and perimandibular surgical procedures, particularly in high-risk or resource-limited settings. Despite heterogeneity and small sample sizes, current evidence supports its wider clinical adoption. Large multicenter randomized controlled trials and standardized protocols are recommended to strengthen the evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.