ArticleAnnals of intensive care2026
"It changed the atmosphere, but how long will it last?": healthcare professionals' experiences of an intervention to improve positive communication in intensive care.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06453616 (Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the "Hello Bundle" Intervention in Reducing Burnout Among ICU Healthcare Professionals), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the "Hello Bundle" Intervention in Reducing Burnout Among ICU Healthcare Professionals
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- If you say Hello, can I say goodbye? A critical reflection on the limits of positive-communication interventions in ICU teams.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Burnout among healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in intensive care units (ICUs) has reached alarming levels, with detrimental effects on staff well-being, patient care, and organizational functioning. The HELLO randomized controlled trial (RCT) tested a multicomponent intervention aimed at reducing burnout by promoting positive communication and teamwork. This qualitative study complemented the RCT by exploring participants' experiences and perceptions of the intervention, identifying barriers, facilitators, and factors influencing sustainability. Methods: This qualitative component was conducted alongside the HELLO cluster-RCT in ICUs across multiple countries. Data sources included (1) 1,155 pictures of messages placed in "HELLO" boxes and on noticeboards, and (2) 26 semi-structured interviews with 27 ICU professionals from 18 ICUs, conducted 4-5 months after the intervention. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Box messages from 26 ICUs in 20 countries revealed recurrent themes of appreciation, recognition, kindness, teamwork, and motivation, often expressed through short, personal notes of gratitude or encouragement. Interviews identified six overarching themes: understanding of the intervention and initial reactions; facilitators and barriers to implementation; focus on messages; local adaptations; immediate positive outcomes; and long-term potential outcomes. Participants reported improved team cohesion, communication, and workplace atmosphere, with leadership engagement emerging as a key facilitator. Barriers included scepticism, workload, and pre-existing workplace tensions. Although many perceived short-term benefits, most noted that the effects diminished over time unless reinforced through continued initiatives. Conclusions: This qualitative study provides insight into healthcare professionals' experiences of the HELLO intervention, highlighting perceived improvements in communication and team atmosphere, as well as challenges related to engagement, workload, and sustainability. These findings can inform future adaptations and implementation strategies for similar low-cost interventions in intensive care units. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06453616 (June 18, 2024).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.