Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890432›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Gambling and hidden practices in forensic psychiatry: a qualitative study of ambivalence, autonomy, and negotiated care.

Rasmus M Hansen, Lisbeth U Sørensen, Søren Kristiansen, Lisbeth Frostholm, Jakob W Eriksen, Thomas Marcussen, Morten D Terkildsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rasmus M HansenDEFACTUM - Social & Health Services and Labor Market, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.
Lisbeth U SørensenDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren KristiansenDepartment of Sociology and Social Work, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Lisbeth FrostholmDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Health Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jakob W EriksenResearch Clinic for Gambling Disorder, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thomas MarcussenResearch Clinic for Gambling Disorder, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Morten D TerkildsenDEFACTUM - Social & Health Services and Labor Market, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This is the first qualitative study to examine how gambling becomes entangled with everyday life, relations, and recovery within medium-secure forensic psychiatric care in Denmark. The aim is to understand how gambling and financial management are experienced and understood by patients and staff, providing insight into how gambling practices intersect with ward life, clinical relations, and recovery processes. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight patients and seven staff members. The study followed an interpretive descriptive design and employed reflexive thematic analysis. Attention was given to participants' accounts of gambling, money management, and the institutional conditions that shape these practices. Results: Patients described gambling as a way to manage boredom, relieve restlessness, and maintain a sense of agency, while also recognizing patterns of loss, debt, and relapse. Gambling was intertwined with attempts at self-regulation, familial involvement, and, at times, other addictions. Staff accounts were fragmented, ranging from viewing gambling as benign recreation to identifying it as a clinical concern linked to impulsivity, mood instability, or conflict. Across interviews, financial autonomy emerged as a central domain. Hidden economies, including informal loans and undisclosed debts, operated outside institutional visibility, complicating therapeutic relations and limiting staff capacity to intervene without eroding trust. Discussion and conclusion: Gambling emerged as an ordinary yet disruptive element of ward life, shaping autonomy and clinical relations and creating secrecy in relations. The discussion suggests that clearer expectations, routine enquiry, and responsive financial support could help address harm caused by gambling without undermining trust. Such measures may strengthen recovery processes, although the impact will depend on how they are integrated into the relational fabric of secure care.

Indexed as

forensic psychiatrygamblingqualitativerecoverythematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41890432
PMCPMC13013535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.