ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Longitudinal trends in blood concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine, inflammatory markers, and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients: a 12-week prospective study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between initial 30-day cumulative clozapine dose and risk of agranulocytosis: A nationwide register-based cohort study.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing Management of Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia in Japan: Promoting a Refined Clozapine Titration Protocol and Addressing the 'Clozapine Ceiling' through Glutamatergic Modulation.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Optimizing Clozapine Monitoring in Older Adults: A Proposal for Ethnicity- and Sex-Informed Monitoring in Japanese Geriatric Patients.Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society · 2026Article
- Clozapine-induced inflammation: a case report.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Clozapine (CLZ) is the gold standard for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), but its use in Japan is limited by strict monitoring and titration-phase adverse events. This prospective 12-week study evaluated longitudinal trends in CLZ/norclozapine (NCLZ) levels, inflammatory markers, metabolic indices, and psychiatric symptoms. Methods: Twenty-one inpatients with TRS were analyzed. To focus on standard titration, patients with inflammatory symptoms (e.g., fever) requiring discontinuation were excluded. Serum CLZ and NCLZ were measured weekly via LC-MS/MS. Clinicians were blinded to these levels; dosing was guided solely by clinical observation. IL-6, HOMA-IR, TG/HDL-C ratios, and PANSS scores were assessed at baseline and designated intervals. Results: CLZ and NCLZ concentrations increased throughout the 12-week period. Significant sex differences emerged in CLZ concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios, with females exhibiting significantly higher levels than males starting at week 2 (p < 0.05). While positive symptoms significantly improved (p < 0.05), no specific longitudinal correlations were found between CLZ/NCLZ levels and changes in IL-6, metabolic indices, or total PANSS scores. Discussion: A "start low, go slow" titration approach can effectively achieve therapeutic concentrations even without real-time therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the significantly higher concentrations observed in female subjects suggest that more cautious dose titration is necessary for female patients, likely due to hormonal influences on metabolic enzymes. Further research is needed on the relationship between clozapine dosage, plasma concentrations and inflammatory side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.