ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences
Comparative Analysis of Topical vs. Systemic Analgesics for Pain Control During Initial Orthodontic Alignment.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pain associated with the initial bonding of fixed appliances and archwire insertion is a primary cause of non-compliance and treatment discontinuation in orthodontics. While systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the gold standard for pain management, they are associated with systemic side effects and potential inhibition of tooth movement. Topical anesthetics offer a localized alternative, but their comparative efficacy against systemic analgesics during the initial alignment phase remains understudied. Materials and Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 60 patients (mean age 16.4 ± 3.2 years) undergoing initial bonding with fixed appliances. Participants were randomly allocated into three groups ( Results: Pain peaked at 24 hours across all groups. At the 24-hour interval, Group A reported the lowest mean pain scores (24.5 ± 12.3 mm), followed by Group B (41.2 ± 15.6 mm) and Group C (62.8 ± 18.1 mm). The difference between Group A and B was statistically significant ( Conclusion: While systemic ibuprofen remains superior for managing deep periodontal pain associated with initial alignment, topical benzocaine provides significant pain reduction compared to placebo and serves as a viable alternative for patients contraindicated for systemic NSAIDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.