ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
Noninvasive detection and monitoring of glioblastoma subtypes via dual-marker plasma proteomics.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by rapid progression and profound molecular heterogeneity. Current diagnostic and monitoring strategies rely on neuroimaging and invasive tissue sampling, which are limited in their ability to capture dynamic disease states and subtype-specific biology. There is an unmet need for minimally invasive biomarkers that can enable reliable detection and longitudinal surveillance. In this study, we investigated whether plasma proteomic profiling could reflect tumor-intrinsic features and systemic responses, thereby supporting noninvasive classification and monitoring of GBM subtypes. Methods: We performed integrative proteomic profiling of matched GBM tumor and plasma samples using tandem mass tag-labeled mass spectrometry and machine learning. Pathway and weighted gene co-expression network analyses were applied to identify systemic alterations. A dual-marker classifier was developed and validated using longitudinal aptamer-based profiling. Results: Tumor proteomes exhibited extensive heterogeneity, while plasma profiles showed marked interpatient homogeneity at both diagnosis and recurrence. Systemic changes were observed in inflammation, coagulation, and complement signaling pathways. A dual-marker plasma classifier comprising coagulation factor IX (F9) and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) distinguished GBM from healthy controls with high accuracy (area under the curve AUC = 0.96), maintaining performance in recurrent disease (AUC = 0.97). Longitudinal analysis revealed divergent trajectories: F9 levels declined post-treatment, while COMP increased, consistent with therapeutic response and disease progression. Conclusions: Our findings support the development of a dual-marker, proteomics-based plasma assay for noninvasive GBM detection and real-time monitoring. This approach has the potential to complement imaging and inform therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.