Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890357›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Enhancing efficiency in pediatric brain tumor segmentation using a pathologically diverse single-center clinical dataset.

Arianna Piffer, Josef Alois Buchner, Antonio Giulio Gennari, Patrice Grehten, Selma Sirin, Elizabeth Ross, Ivan Ezhov, Marcel Rosier, Jan Caspar Peeken, Marie Piraud and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Arianna PifferDivision of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5078-4681
Josef Alois BuchnerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Antonio Giulio GennariDepartment of Neuropaediatrics, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Patrice GrehtenDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Selma SirinDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elizabeth RossGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Georgia Institute of Technology, Hanover, United States (E.R.).
Ivan EzhovDepartment of Computer Science, TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marcel RosierHelmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jan Caspar PeekenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Marie PiraudHelmholtz AI, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Munich, Germany.
Bjoern MenzeDepartment of Quantitative Biomedicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Ana Guerreiro StücklinDivision of Oncology and Children's Research Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andras JakabCenter for MR- Research, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Florian KoflerTranslaTUM-Central Institute for Translational Cancer Research, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brain tumors are the most common solid malignancies in children, encompassing diverse histological, molecular subtypes, and imaging features and outcomes. Pediatric brain tumors (PBTs), including high- and low-grade gliomas (HGG and LGG), medulloblastomas (MB), ependymomas, and rarer forms, pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Deep learning (DL)-based segmentation offers promising tools for tumor delineation, yet its performance across heterogeneous PBT subtypes and MRI protocols remains uncertain. Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort of 174 pediatric patients with HGG, LGG, MB, ependymomas, and other rarer subtypes was used. MRI sequences included T1, T1 post-contrast (T1-C), T2, and FLAIR. Manual annotations were provided for 4 tumor subregions: whole tumor (WT), T2-hyperintensity (T2H), enhancing tumor (ET), and cystic component (CC). A 3D nnU-Net model was trained and tested (121/53 split), with segmentation performance assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and compared against intra- and interrater variability. Results: The model achieved robust performance for WT and T2H (mean DSC: 0.85), comparable to human annotator variability (mean DSC: 0.86). ET segmentation was moderately accurate (mean DSC: 0.75), while CC performance was poor (mean DSC: 0.26). Segmentation accuracy varied by tumor type, MRI sequence combination, and location. Notably, T1, T1-C, and T2 combined produced results nearly equivalent to the full protocol. Conclusions: DL-based segmentation is feasible for PBTs, particularly for T2H and WT. Challenges remain for ET and CC segmentation, highlighting the need for further refinement. These findings support the potential for protocol simplification and automation to enhance volumetric assessment and streamline pediatric neuro-oncology workflows.

Indexed as

deep learningMRI segmentationnnU-Netpediatric brain tumourstumor subregions

Identifiers

PMID41890357
PMCPMC13012855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.