ArticleActa medica Philippina2026
Mental Health Literacy among Young and Adult Population in the Caraga Region, Philippines.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental health literacy (MHL) is an important mental health strategy since it contributes to early detection, enhances help-seeking behavior, and reduces stigma and discrimination against people with mental disorders. Objective: The objectives of the present study were to assess the level of mental health literacy and its correlation, and to examine the predictive effect of demographic profiles on mental health literacy among young and adult populations in the five cities of Caraga, using a standardized mental health literacy scale in 2023. Methods: This study applied a cross-sectional survey. It surveyed 729 individuals from five cities in Caraga using the Mental Health Literacy Scale from Dias et al. Descriptive analysis, such as frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, and inferential statistics, such as Pearson correlation, independent t-test, and multi-linear regression, were used for data analysis. Results: The mental health literacy of the young and adult populations can be classified as adequate or good. Zooming in on details, the respondents have a very good understanding of help-seeking behavior and self-strategies but only a good understanding of knowledge and beliefs/attitudes. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between knowledge, erroneous beliefs, self-strategies, and help-seeking behavior (p <0.001). In addition, Independent t-test and ANOVA revealed significant differences in sex, family income, employment, civil status, educational level, and age group (p <0.01). A multiple linear regression indicated that demographic profile predictors were found to be statistically significant, and positively with mental health literacy, with education and family income as the strongest predictors. Conclusion: The present study concluded that the young and adult populations in the five cities in Caraga have adequate literacy on mental health, encompassing knowledge, beliefs, self-strategies, and help-seeking behaviors. The increases in knowledge, belief, and self-strategies are associated with their higher level of help-seeking; in addition, the demographic profiles (e.g., sex, age, education, monthly income, and employment) have implications on young and adults' mental health literacy in the five cities in Caraga. The result may not be generalizable beyond the studied region or demographic. In addition, it recommended that mental health literacy programs prioritize individuals with lower levels of education and family income as these factors were found to have the most significant influence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.