ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
Unlocking electronic health records: a hybrid graph RAG approach to safe clinical AI for patient QA.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation Methods for Inference-Time Retrieval-Augmented and Graph Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Electronic health record (EHR) systems present clinicians with vast repositories of clinical information, creating a significant cognitive burden where critical details are easily overlooked. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer transformative potential for data processing, they face significant limitations in clinical settings, particularly regarding context grounding and hallucinations. Current solutions typically isolate retrieval methods, focusing either on structured data (SQL/Cypher) or unstructured semantic search, but fail to integrate both simultaneously. Methods: This work presents MediGRAF (Medical Graph Retrieval Augmented Framework), a novel hybrid Graph RAG system that bridges this gap. By uniquely combining Neo4j Text2Cypher capabilities for structured relationship traversal with vector embeddings for unstructured narrative retrieval, MediGRAF enables natural language querying of the complete patient journey. The system was evaluated using data from 10 patients from the MIMIC-IV dataset, generating 5,973 nodes and 5,963 relationships, across varying query complexities using both deterministic retrieval metrics and a structured clinical expert evaluation protocol. Results: The system demonstrated 100% recall for factual queries, meaning all relevant information was retrieved and included in the output. Complex inference tasks achieved a mean expert quality score of 4.25/5 with zero safety violations across all evaluated cases. Discussion: These results demonstrate that hybrid graph-grounding significantly advances clinical information retrieval, offering a safer and more comprehensive alternative to standard LLM deployments. By combining structured graph traversal with semantic vector search, MediGRAF addresses the critical limitations of isolated retrieval approaches, establishing a foundation for responsible AI deployment in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.