ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Evaluation of cotton production sustainability and water footprints in the oasis area of southern Xinjiang under climate change.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human Activities Have Reduced the Potential Distribution of Cotton in Xinjiang, but Climate Change Is Expected to Expand Its Future Suitable Area.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The sharp increase in temperature and changes in other climatic variables have profoundly impacted cotton growth, posing a significant threat to the stability of cotton yields in the oasis region of southern Xinjiang. Methods: This study employed the AquaCrop model (Version 6.1) and CMIP6 SSP245BCC-CSM2-MR future climate scenario data to comprehensively evaluate the impacts of different irrigation and mulching methods on cotton water consumption, water footprints (blue and green water footprints), crop yields, and their long-term stability and sustainability from 2021 to 2099. Results and discussion: Increasing temperatures under future climate change scenarios could significantly reduce cotton water consumption and water footprints, while increase cotton yield, yield stability, sustainability, and overall irrigation water productivity (WP). Compared to the baseline period of 1981-2020, cotton water consumption and water footprints in 2021-2060 and 2061-2099 are expected to decrease by 29.3% and 28.8%, and 41.6% and 42.6%, respectively. Concurrently, cotton yield and WP are projected to experience an increase of 39.8% (50%) and 49.2% (60.25%), respectively. A comprehensive evaluation based on Technique of Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution revealed that under the historical climate conditions from 1981-2020, an irrigation quota of 495 mm for film mulching drip irrigation and 594 mm for filmless drip irrigation exhibited favorable effects on cotton yields but resulted in increased irrigation water consumption. However, under the future climate scenarios for the periods of 2021-2060 and 2061-2099, the elimination of film mulching and a reduction in irrigation quotas are not expected to have a detrimental impact on the sustainability and stability of cotton yields. This study provides valuable insights for enhancing the resilience and productivity of cotton in response to climate change in southern Xinjiang and analogous regions, which hold significant for policymakers to formulate strategies for the sustainable development of agriculture and plan the allocation of water resources in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.