Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890264›Full record

ReviewBiomedical engineering letters2026

Functional hydrogels as submucosal injectable materials in therapeutic endoscopy.

Chi-Pin James Wang, Chun Gwon Park, Se-Na Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical engineering letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chi-Pin James WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Cross-disciplinary Studies (ICS), Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), 16419 Gyeonggi-do Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Chun Gwon ParkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Cross-disciplinary Studies (ICS), Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), 16419 Gyeonggi-do Suwon, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8926-3418
Se-Na KimResearch and Development Center, MediArk Inc., 28644 Chungcheongbuk-Do Cheongju, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic endoscopy, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), has transformed the management of early gastrointestinal (GI) cancers by enabling the resection of large and complex lesions. However, its widespread adoption remains limited by technical difficulty and the high risk of complications such as bleeding, perforation, and stricture. Submucosal injection materials (SIMs) are critical to ESD procedures as they provide mucosal elevation, but the elevation achieved by solution-based SIMs is typically short-lived due to rapid absorption or diffusion, often necessitating multiple injections during surgery. Recent advances in injectable hydrogels present a promising strategy to overcome these limitations. Owing to their tunable physicochemical and biological properties, hydrogels can prolong submucosal elevation, reduce injection force, and actively contribute to the management of complications. Preclinical investigations of two-component, thermoresponsive, and shear-thinning hydrogels have demonstrated favorable biocompatibility and compatibility with endoscopic delivery systems. Moreover, functional hydrogels engineered with hemostatic, adhesive, antifibrotic, or regenerative properties have shown potential to mitigate intraprocedural bleeding, accelerate wound healing, and prevent stricture formation. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of preclinical hydrogel-based SIMs, focusing on how these novel materials may reshape the tools and strategies available in advanced endoscopic practices, particularly ESD.

Indexed as

BiomaterialEndoscopic Submucosal DissectionEndoscopyHydrogelInjectable

Identifiers

PMID41890264
PMCPMC13013869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.