ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
Analysis of sex differences in cisplatin-induced conditioned taste aversion.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Establishment and characterization of a mouse model of cisplatin-induced olfactory aversion.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced taste disorders and food aversion are important adverse effects that lead to reduced food intake and a deteriorated quality of life. Sex differences have been proposed to influence their development, but findings remain inconsistent, and no clinical consensus has been established. Further basic research is required to clarify these discrepancies underlying mechanisms. In this study, conditioned taste aversion (CTA) was evaluated in C57BL/6J mice after intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin, prepared in physiological saline, using a two-bottle choice test with distilled water and a saccharin-containing solution as drinking options. To assess the influence of saccharin on sweet taste sensitivity, four concentrations of saccharin-containing solutions were tested. A clear sex difference emerged during CTA development. Male mice showed reduced aversion at lower saccharin concentrations, that did not elicit preference, and no aversion at the lowest concentration. In contrast, female mice exhibited the onset of CTA even at concentrations that did not induce preference. Given reports of higher sweet-taste sensitivity in females, these findings suggest that CTA is driven by taste stimulation rather than taste preference. Additionally, female mice showed a lower propensity to develop CTA at 0.02% saccharin concentration than male mice. To investigate whether female sex hormones regulate CTA development, estradiol (E2) was administered subcutaneously before cisplatin treatment, followed by the same behavioral assessments. E2 administration ameliorated CTA, suggesting that E2 may facilitate the extinction of aversive learning. In summary, cisplatin-induced CTA appears to be triggered by taste stimulation itself, and E2 may represent a potential therapeutic approach for mitigating cisplatin-induced CTA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.