ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2026
Preclinical models of stem cell-mediated analgesia and tissue repair: mechanisms, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an emerging biological therapeutic approach, stem cell therapy demonstrates broad application prospects in analgesia and tissue regeneration, particularly achieving significant advances in treating conditions such as spinal cord injury and intervertebral disc degeneration. In recent years, preclinical model studies have deepened our understanding of the mechanisms underlying stem cell-mediated pain relief and tissue repair, revealing their potential to regulate inflammatory responses, promote nerve regeneration, and repair damaged tissues through multiple pathways. However, the heterogeneity of preclinical models and the discrepancies between these models and clinical practice, coupled with often insufficient critical appraisal of study quality, remain critical issues requiring urgent resolution in this field. This narrative review systematically summarizes the fundamental theories and key mechanisms underlying stem cell-mediated analgesia and regeneration. It comprehensively evaluates the advantages and limitations of different animal models, critically analyzes major controversies and technical challenges in research, and identifies key directions for future studies. The literature discussed herein was identified through searches in PubMed and Web of Science databases, focusing on recent preclinical studies (primarily within the last decade) involving stem cells, pain models, and tissue regeneration. Selected studies were evaluated for their methodological rigor and contribution to mechanistic understanding. This review aims to synthesize current evidence, critically appraise preclinical models, and provide a forward-looking perspective for research on stem cell-related analgesia and regenerative mechanisms, thereby promoting further development in clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.