ArticleProceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting2024
Sensitivity Analysis of Life History Data with Loss to Follow-up: Extending Multistate Models Using Multiple Imputation.
Article in Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Life history data describes a process that progresses through various stages before reaching a terminal event, providing detailed insights into the entire disease trajectory. It is increasingly used in health research to evaluate treatment effects, risk factors, and policy implementations. However, handling loss to follow-up (LTF) remains a major challenge since conventional multistate models often assume that LTF-induced censoring is independent of the life history process, an assumption that may not hold in practice. This paper addresses this issue through sensitivity analysis, which characterizes deviations from independent censoring and evaluates the impact on treatment effect estimation. We extend the classical multistate model to include separate pre- and post-LTF transition intensities. Using a delta-adjusted (DA) sensitivity assumption, we apply multiple imputation (MI) to generate potential outcomes beyond LTF. The proposed framework is illustrated using real-world data to assess the impact of the World Health Organization's Treat All policy on HIV disease progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.