Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41890198›Full record

ArticleProceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting2024

Sensitivity Analysis of Life History Data with Loss to Follow-up: Extending Multistate Models Using Multiple Imputation.

Hongbin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. American Statistical Association. Annual Meeting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hongbin ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 725 Rose Street, Lexington, KY 40536.

Funding

Developing Statistical Methods on Event History Data Subject to Data Complexities for HIV Disease Progression and Policy EvaluationR21AI177008 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI NASH, DENIS, ZHANG, HONGBIN · 2023 to 2024
$461k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI177008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Life history data describes a process that progresses through various stages before reaching a terminal event, providing detailed insights into the entire disease trajectory. It is increasingly used in health research to evaluate treatment effects, risk factors, and policy implementations. However, handling loss to follow-up (LTF) remains a major challenge since conventional multistate models often assume that LTF-induced censoring is independent of the life history process, an assumption that may not hold in practice. This paper addresses this issue through sensitivity analysis, which characterizes deviations from independent censoring and evaluates the impact on treatment effect estimation. We extend the classical multistate model to include separate pre- and post-LTF transition intensities. Using a delta-adjusted (DA) sensitivity assumption, we apply multiple imputation (MI) to generate potential outcomes beyond LTF. The proposed framework is illustrated using real-world data to assess the impact of the World Health Organization's Treat All policy on HIV disease progression.

Indexed as

independent censoringlife history processlost to follow-upmultiple imputationpeople living with HIVsensitivity analysisTreat All policy

Identifiers

PMID41890198
PMCPMC13014604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.