ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Negative allometry of egg size among 29 species of drosophilid flies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The body size of adults and immature stages are fundamental animal traits that influence animal physiology, ecology, and range distribution. While the importance of egg size has been acknowledged as a proxy of parental investment in animals, little work has addressed the tempo and mode of evolution of egg size and shape. Here, we present a comparative study of this trait using a phylogeny based on genome-wide markers together with measurements of egg size and adult body size from 29 drosophilid species. Our analyses revisit the allometric relationship between egg size and body size and show that egg size scales negatively with respect to adult size, even after accounting for shared evolutionary history. In other words, larger species tend to produce proportionally smaller eggs. We also detect a moderate phylogenetic signal in both egg size and egg shape, indicating that closely related species resemble each other in these traits. Model comparisons show that the evolution of egg morphology in drosophilids is best described by gradual divergence through time driven by stochastic evolutionary change. This pattern contrasts with findings from other animal groups, including birds, cephalopods, and reptiles, where alternative evolutionary models better explain trait evolution. Together, these results suggest that the evolutionary dynamics shaping egg morphology in drosophilids differ from those operating in other major lineages and underscore the importance of comparative analyses of early developmental traits across taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.