ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Structural and Functional Connectivity Predict the Effects of Direct Brain Stimulation on Memory.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intracranial stimulation can enhance episodic memory in humans; however, the behavioral effects vary substantially across individuals and stimulation sites. Here, we investigated whether the network embedding of a stimulation target, defined by MRI-based normative structural and functional connectivity, accounts for variability in stimulation-linked memory enhancement. We analyzed data from 50 adults with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent intracranial EEG monitoring and completed a verbal delayed free-recall task during stimulation of left temporal cortex sites across 61 sessions (39 closed-loop; 22 random). On average, closed-loop stimulation delivered during classifier-detected low-encoding states increased recall rates, whereas random stimulation produced no reliable benefit. Diffusion tractography from a normative database showed that sites yielding greater memory enhancement were characterized by stronger structural coupling to a distributed fronto-temporo-parietal network. Greater structure-function congruence with a normative verbal-encoding activation network predicted larger closed-loop memory benefit (Spearman ρ = 0.58, P < 0.0001). Functional connectivity exhibited overlapping trends but did not yield robust regional associations after permutation correction. Multivariate Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling further identified stimulation mode, baseline memory, and a structural profile factor as independent predictors of memory enhancement, with no independent contribution of functional connectivity. These findings indicate that reliable stimulation-driven memory improvement depends not only on the timing of stimulation, but also on whether the stimulated target is structurally embedded within an encoding-relevant network scaffold.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.